Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On May 29, 2006, at 11:16 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Would it be possible to bump up the font sizes in RST? The `` ``
why not use StructuredText ? (i found rst impractical at the least) (oh again one of those IO answers: "you don't want to do that"...)
The syntax is horrid when trying to include code. It was interpreting all of the *'s in the functions (char *, etc). Actually, I'd much
oh, does it? this is bad.
however, i usually use single quotes (ST) to get 'code' and it works pretty well. http://puredata.info/Members/zmoelnig/delme
prefer mediawiki/dokuwiki style syntax, it works much better. I spend very little time reading syntax charts with those, while with ST and RST I find I am constantly debugging the syntax.
i never made my way around RST, but i am pretty fine with ST. anyhow, i don't know a simple way to include mediawiki style without breaking everything in the next upgrade...
inline quote font is almost unreadable.
in such cases i usually push "Ctrl++" on my firefox...
Hardly a solution. Everyone should really just use lynx with the console font.
which is the other option :-) or use a browser for the blind (i hope it won't muffle the tiny fonts)
anyhow, on first glance i wasn't able to find the culprit (but actually i never made it into css-writing either)
mfg.asdr. IOhannes