o the quivering wing of affectation. o the tumult in my soul.
do find self unwilling + unable to indulge that inkompetent + lazy + korporat fascist exploiters e.g. ircam serfs wish.
for simply - they not the parallel brain cells have my meaning to kompute [may explain their present position + gender] so be it. my eyes tear less lest one knows the truth in them.
forward this + all of my transmissions to your master as desired - you may so do. i may post to this state funded forum as i well wish when wish how i wish. as every one else so may do.
simply because your masters have decided how you must live one should not.must not.will not conclude + automatically others obligated are korporat fascist slaves like you become. fin - else 100 martian elephants on me shall walk and now.
[you lose]
i lokate self at simply.superior coordinates to decide that which my desires satisfies - not you. making your memories stick. not you.
my suggestion to konsum 01+ kalmant is. have a seat and admire me.
it would a monumental victory be - for all french citizenz - if you the unwashed amalgam at ircam became as superb as i and stopped throwing their money into the atmosphere.
to Francois.Dechelle@ircam.fr - you are a testament to the great scientifik m9nds of our day monsieur. i salute your astonishing career - gaze up at the luminous cosmos and deklare. o that you may be god.
friendly. nn
Emmanuel Rio - and what may thou be. a kloned sheep +? tis unforgivable. for this the pyramids were raised +? velikovskian katastrofism.
Francois Dechelle Francois.Dechelle@ircam.fr
Emmanuel Rio wrote:
Hello, I complain about the behaviour of integer@www.god-emil.dk on the
jmax list, since he/she/they fill the list with undoubtedly very interesting messages which have however no relation with our topic, and which are most of time ununderstandable. I'm really tired of these silly mails which are very courageously addressed to syndicate@ircam.fr, lev@ircam.fr or freesound@ircam.fr, and I propose the exclusion of this mail sender (and all the phantom ones which will certainly appear afterwards), and the erasure of all the messages still remaining on the archive ( http://www.ircam.fr/listes/archives/jmax/maillist.html ). What about you?
Emmanuel Rio
-- +---------------------------------------+ | Emmanuel Rio | | R&D Engineer | +---------------------------------------+ | Projet Listen - http://listen.gmd.de/ | | Département Acoustique des Salles | | IRCAM - http://www.ircam.fr/ | | 1, Place Igor Stravinsky | | 75004 PARIS | +---------------------------------------+ | mailto:Emmanuel.Rio@ircam.fr | | tel : +33 1 44 78 48 26 | | fax : +33 1 44 78 15 40 | +---------------------------------------+
The amount of messages adressed to the list by integer@... does not respect the list policy, that I have adressed to the list and that I recall below. I kindly asked some time ago integer@... to limit the number of posts and to use the list nato@ircam.fr, which has been created for this purpose. As you have noticed, this has remained without effect.
Furthermore, recent messages from integer@... do not respect the [OT] header in subject.
François Déchelle
Reminder of jMax list policy, posted Thu, 16 Nov 2000:
. Hello, . . Due to recent abuses of the list, the mailing list jmax@ircam.fr will now . obey the following policy: . - list posting is closed, i.e. posting to the list is restricted to list . members. If you have not subscribed to the list, you cannot post to the list. . - subscribing to the list will be moderated. . . The list jmax@ircam.fr is dedicated to the jMax software. Off-topic posts . are allowed, as long as they remain in limited amount and they concern . things that are slightly related to jMax. Off-topic posters are kindly . asked to add an [OT] tag in subject. . . This changes are immediate. You are invited to check that the address . that you use for posting is the same as your subscribing address. If . these addresses don't match, your posts will be rejected. .