I think it would be a better investigation if you observed terminology _in use_, ie extracting terms from a dialogue. but here goes: a sample: bright, grainy, noisy, clicky, evolving, harsh, smooth, clean a mix: muddy, sparse, terms relating to space, volume, depth, "closeness" of sounds, tight, heavy, crisp, blurry, light and shade, brash, contrasty (yeah contrasty's a word...) that sort of thing? -poil-
This is just a start, if the results are promising, I may go more into depth, including doing perceptual similarity mapping tests like used by Wessel, Grey and Gordon, etc.
.hc
On Thursday, Apr 22, 2004, at 09:41 America/New_York, droid wrote:
I think it would be a better investigation if you observed terminology _in use_, ie extracting terms from a dialogue. but here goes: a sample: bright, grainy, noisy, clicky, evolving, harsh, smooth, clean a mix: muddy, sparse, terms relating to space, volume, depth, "closeness" of sounds, tight, heavy, crisp, blurry, light and shade, brash, contrasty (yeah contrasty's a word...) that sort of thing? -poil-
PD-ot mailing list PD-ot@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-ot
________________________________________________________________________ ____
"If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of everyone, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it."
- Thomas Jefferson