moved to OT :-)
Steffen Juul wrote:
On 12/05/2008, at 23.40, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Maybe you want to change that as well while you're at it
Good idea.
i second that.
- with an advance warning so I can adapt my filter in time.
Alternatively you could make your filter look for list-id in '"List- ID:" [phrase] "<" list-id ">"' instead of (part of) phrase.
true words indeed.
mfgas.dr IOhannes
PS: i will announce officially when i switch via pd-announce; but for now i think the discussion is not very Pd-specific...
On 13/05/2008, at 18.46, Steffen Juul wrote:
On 13/05/2008, at 9.10, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
moved to OT :-)
Superb. I now noticed that pd-ot don't have a List-Id header. The RFC 2919 ninja team will sone slice us up ;-o
Or.. it's there in the email i sent before this one, but not in the one by you/IOhannes.
Steffen Juul wrote:
On 13/05/2008, at 18.46, Steffen Juul wrote:
Or.. it's there in the email i sent before this one, but not in the one by you/IOhannes.
well, i sent my reply to pd-ot, and directly to frank and you. you probably have set the "no-dupes" flag, so you only got the email i directly sent to you, without any list-id headers (as it did not come from the list)
this one goes via the list, so you should get a list-id header.
fgmadr IOhannes