The label "august" hathe been affixed to this message,
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, RTaylor wrote:
In other words you want CREDIT. ... Like "Nigel Rathbone's Tales of
Trailers"> or "Marimba Freidkiens Kitchen Sexuality".
Somehow that just doesn't seem to be in keeping with the concept of open source. It also strikes me as being overly pretentious... Like I'd be much
more> likely to simply use your idea and write my own code. {Like most everyone else> would.} If I were to attribute someone that heavily it would be out of
respect... not because of some clause in a contract...
attribution is very important. I've started a pure software project
Of course it is... Anyone with any intelligence whatsoever understands that.
before, where I came up with the idea and design, sat and coded this project from the ground up side-by-side with another guy for two straight years. eventually, as the software became better and better, the guy wanted all of the recognition. after a break-up, my code (mostly gui stuff) was just tossed to the side and my name was nowhere to be found on the website (his server) or in the copyright anywhere. It sucks to loose two years like that. And, this was not even 'art'.
If your code is "tossed to the side"... what are you wanting attributed?
Richard Stallman is another example. How many times have you heard him say "It's GNU/Linux" not "Linux". He's bitter that some dopey finnish lad is getting most of the limelight for something into which he put most of the grunt work
I think most folk understand that Linus wrote the kernel, the idea that it's GNU means its "free", etc, etc... You're thinking no one reads the documents?
attribution is not to be underestimated, especailly in creative fields such as software development or art, where your livelyhood is based on what YOU do. Assuming you want to make a living from what you do (as apposed to programming on the side as a hobby). you will need to take the attribution thing seriously.
Where above does it say that I don't?