.n++k wrote:
assuming you're not joking,
actually i was.
he meant delays more like 1ms and below (down to around the resolution of a sample, which is not anymore a delay, but a filter)
which is plain wrong. a delay of 1sample is nothing but a delay of 1ms (and sounds exactly like the original signal, but a little bit later) you can test this with [z~] object of zexy. (and yes, i know how what a IIR-filter is)
i just wanted to point out, that the argument didn't make sense to me.
and: i think there is a legal definition of how much of the original sound has to be preserved/discarded to (not) make a new piece out of an another one with(out) violating others' copyrights.
mfg.sd.r IOhannes