No, MDK still has 2.96. I had a lot of problems with MDK, especially when compiling C++. Their customization of the Linux base system and tools goes a bit too far, IMHO. It's extremely easy to set up though (which takes away all the fun :-) ).
mik
----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Dobson" RWD@cableinet.co.uk To: "pd-list" pd-list@iem.kug.ac.at Sent: Saturday, November 24, 2001 2:50 PM Subject: Re: [OT] Re: [PD] Plugin~ object!
I'm currently using Mandrake 7.2 - which has proved a bad move (from RH 6) as it does not configure my SoundBlaster 16 properly - I have to do it by hand each time I boot into Linux. Which is probably why I don't boot into it very often! RH6 didn't have this problem. According to the Mandrake 8 box, it uses the unofficial gcc 2.96 that was such a problem with Redhat 7. Does Mdk 8.1 fix that? I have heard that RH 7.2 does restore the proper 2.95 gcc.
Richard Dobson
Damien HENRY wrote:
mandrake 8 & 8.1 are very good.
Le Samedi 24 Novembre 2001 07:01, ludwig zeininger a écrit :
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 23 Nov 2001, Michal Seta wrote: ::BTW, speaking of not messed up distros. ::Can someone tell me which one isn't messed up? ::My RH7 is driving me crazy lately. ::I would like to upgrade to something less messed up. ::I've had only experience with RH. ::How easy is it to switch to say, debian.
-- Test your DAW with my Soundcard Attrition Page! http://www.bath.ac.uk/~masrwd (LU: 18th July 2001) CDP: http://www.bath.ac.uk/~masjpf/CDP/CDP.htm (LU: 1st August 2001)