Hello João
João Pais a écrit :
>
>> by any chance, you are not running an amd64 system? (this is getting hot
>> ground for me, as i am not so sure whether PdX actually does have some
>> x86_64 patches incorporated; but chances are low....)
>>
>
> my new desktop is a 64 d-core intel, I have windows and ubuntu there. it's
> still new, so I didn't work much with it so far. in windows works well,
> but I can't get ubuntu to access my quite normal home network, so I didn't
> got further on that. I can do some testing, if you want (just tell me what
> to do).
>
>
Since my question is a little bit out of pd topic, this one has been
sent to pd-ot...
I've tried linux X86_64 for three years with fedora kanotix and ubuntu,
just because my new computers has 64bit cpu, and to see if there are
better performances.
Obviously I've encountered a lot of problems involved by this new
technology, like recompiling programs with the good flags,
making a chroot32 environment for closed-source software that has not
64bit compatibility, and others I might have forgotten since,
fortunately I've been learning a lot about computers during this
adventure in the world of 64bit.
At the end I stopped to use 64bit OS because I didn't see any
difference with 32bit ones, I don't need more than 2Go of RAM, and pd
isn't able to use all the processors of my amd dual core (I guess it
would be the same with intel), also pd is not able to use 64bit integers.
So my question is, is there a particular reason for using a 64bit OS?
(given the fact that you are not maintaining binaries)
Do you see any improvement in regard of 32bit?
Sorry for all these weird questions, and thank you for the contribution,
Patrice.