Hi list,
I am about to update PureMeasurement and have just run into the following problem (see the attached patch pm_fftanalyzer_2ch.pd): The patch itself works for me. However, if I just change the size of the graphs associated with $0-testsignal or $0-magnitude, then those arrays will get redrawn from time to time, but not in a reliable manner any more. For instance, changing the magnitude display to S11 or S22 (and perhaps back to FRF:2re1) will eventually freeze the graph.
Could anyone explain this behavior? Is the only solution to leave it as it is and not to touch it?
If that matters, it happens on 0.42.5-extended-rc5 under Ubuntu 10.04.
Thanks for your help, Matthias
Hey Matthis,
It sounds like you are describing this bug:
donecanvasdialog stops arrays from redrawing until reload http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3052388&group_id=557...
If so, could you add your experience and your patch to the bug report? If you log in before, then you'll be automatiaclly emailed when the bug report status changes.
.hc
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 11:46 +0200, Matthias Blau wrote:
Hi list,
I am about to update PureMeasurement and have just run into the following problem (see the attached patch pm_fftanalyzer_2ch.pd): The patch itself works for me. However, if I just change the size of the graphs associated with $0-testsignal or $0-magnitude, then those arrays will get redrawn from time to time, but not in a reliable manner any more. For instance, changing the magnitude display to S11 or S22 (and perhaps back to FRF:2re1) will eventually freeze the graph.
Could anyone explain this behavior? Is the only solution to leave it as it is and not to touch it?
If that matters, it happens on 0.42.5-extended-rc5 under Ubuntu 10.04.
Thanks for your help, Matthias _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hi,
hm, not sure whether this really is the same bug. On the machine where I originally discovered the problem (intel atom processor, Ubuntu 10.04, pd-0.42.5-extended-rc5), the arraybug.pd patch by hcs doesn't update the array graph correctly, no matter whether "hide object..." is checked or not.
On another machine (intel core2 processor, Ubuntu 10.04, pd-0.42.5-extended-20100105), the arraybug.pd patch updates the array graph correctly all the time! Moreover, I can't reproduce the problem I was describing in my post on this machine!
So, it seems to be machine-dependent? Very strange.
Best regards, Matthias
On 08/30/2010 07:55 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey Matthis,
It sounds like you are describing this bug:
donecanvasdialog stops arrays from redrawing until reload http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3052388&group_id=557...
If so, could you add your experience and your patch to the bug report? If you log in before, then you'll be automatiaclly emailed when the bug report status changes.
.hc
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 11:46 +0200, Matthias Blau wrote:
Hi list,
I am about to update PureMeasurement and have just run into the following problem (see the attached patch pm_fftanalyzer_2ch.pd): The patch itself works for me. However, if I just change the size of the graphs associated with $0-testsignal or $0-magnitude, then those arrays will get redrawn from time to time, but not in a reliable manner any more. For instance, changing the magnitude display to S11 or S22 (and perhaps back to FRF:2re1) will eventually freeze the graph.
Could anyone explain this behavior? Is the only solution to leave it as it is and not to touch it?
If that matters, it happens on 0.42.5-extended-rc5 under Ubuntu 10.04.
Thanks for your help, Matthias _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
I have the same issue on P dual core 2, with 10-04 and rc5.
Also weird or not, I'm having the issue (a few times) on a AMD dual core, with pd extended 0.42 (not rc5).
(i tested with array bug, although in tabwrite~ help the array syncs very well at all times... )
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Matthias Blau blau_m@web.de wrote:
Hi,
hm, not sure whether this really is the same bug. On the machine where I originally discovered the problem (intel atom processor, Ubuntu 10.04, pd-0.42.5-extended-rc5), the arraybug.pd patch by hcs doesn't update the array graph correctly, no matter whether "hide object..." is checked or not.
On another machine (intel core2 processor, Ubuntu 10.04, pd-0.42.5-extended-20100105), the arraybug.pd patch updates the array graph correctly all the time! Moreover, I can't reproduce the problem I was describing in my post on this machine!
So, it seems to be machine-dependent? Very strange.
Best regards, Matthias
On 08/30/2010 07:55 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey Matthis,
It sounds like you are describing this bug:
donecanvasdialog stops arrays from redrawing until reload
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3052388&group_id=557...
If so, could you add your experience and your patch to the bug report? If you log in before, then you'll be automatiaclly emailed when the bug report status changes.
.hc
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 11:46 +0200, Matthias Blau wrote:
Hi list,
I am about to update PureMeasurement and have just run into the following problem (see the attached patch pm_fftanalyzer_2ch.pd): The patch itself works for me. However, if I just change the size of the graphs associated with $0-testsignal or $0-magnitude, then those arrays will get redrawn from time to time, but not in a reliable manner any more. For instance, changing the magnitude display to S11 or S22 (and perhaps back to FRF:2re1) will eventually freeze the graph.
Could anyone explain this behavior? Is the only solution to leave it as it is and not to touch it?
If that matters, it happens on 0.42.5-extended-rc5 under Ubuntu 10.04.
Thanks for your help, Matthias _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
I've seen this on at least two different computers running Ubuntu/ Lucid, and on Mac OS X.
.hc
On Sep 1, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Pedro Lopes wrote:
I have the same issue on P dual core 2, with 10-04 and rc5.
Also weird or not, I'm having the issue (a few times) on a AMD dual core, with pd extended 0.42 (not rc5).
(i tested with array bug, although in tabwrite~ help the array syncs very well at all times... )
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:29 PM, Matthias Blau blau_m@web.de wrote:
Hi,
hm, not sure whether this really is the same bug. On the machine where I originally discovered the problem (intel atom processor, Ubuntu 10.04, pd-0.42.5-extended-rc5), the arraybug.pd
patch by hcs doesn't update the array graph correctly, no matter whether "hide object..." is checked or not.On another machine (intel core2 processor, Ubuntu 10.04, pd-0.42.5-extended-20100105), the arraybug.pd patch updates the
array graph correctly all the time! Moreover, I can't reproduce the problem I was describing in my post on this machine!So, it seems to be machine-dependent? Very strange.
Best regards, Matthias
On 08/30/2010 07:55 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey Matthis,
It sounds like you are describing this bug:
donecanvasdialog stops arrays from redrawing until reload
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3052388&group_id=557...
If so, could you add your experience and your patch to the bug
report? If you log in before, then you'll be automatiaclly emailed when
the bug report status changes..hc
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 11:46 +0200, Matthias Blau wrote:
Hi list,
I am about to update PureMeasurement and have just run into the following problem (see the attached patch pm_fftanalyzer_2ch.pd): The patch itself works for me. However, if I just change the size
of the graphs associated with $0-testsignal or $0-magnitude, then those
arrays will get redrawn from time to time, but not in a reliable manner
any more. For instance, changing the magnitude display to S11 or S22
(and perhaps back to FRF:2re1) will eventually freeze the graph.Could anyone explain this behavior? Is the only solution to leave
it as it is and not to touch it?If that matters, it happens on 0.42.5-extended-rc5 under Ubuntu
10.04.Thanks for your help, Matthias _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-- Pedro Lopes (ongoing MSc) contact: pedro.lopes@ist.utl.pt website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
There is no way to peace, peace is the way. -A.J. Muste
-
Hans-Christoph Steiner -
Matthias Blau -
Pedro Lopes