I'm using pure data for a school concert. Its my first time playing live with pd. Just wanted some input from the list about my patch.
tear it appart
alex
Very nice. I wish my first patch had been so clean.
Here's a tip for GOP. Rather than spacing it all out, it's easier to keep the window size just large enough for your controls and put all the other stuff in a subpatch "guts", then connect the GUI to the guts using local send/receive (all the GUI controls have a send and receive built in). Check out the one I've attached for an example. (the array name is ugly, it wasn't there when I was running pd .39, and I haven't turned it off now that I'm back in .38-2).
Cheers
amatheso@alcor.concordia.ca wrote:
I'm using pure data for a school concert. Its my first time playing live with pd. Just wanted some input from the list about my patch.
tear it appart
alex
Hallo, amatheso@alcor.concordia.ca hat gesagt: // amatheso@alcor.concordia.ca wrote:
I'm using pure data for a school concert. Its my first time playing live with pd. Just wanted some input from the list about my patch.
Indeed very cool patch. I wish you good luck for the concert, I see no real problems with the patch, which should "just work"(tm) ;)
Some future enhancements would be, to move the 4 sample players into their own files and convert them to abstractions. You can then pass the name of the array as first argument into the abstraction by calling the array "$1-sample" (didn't work with earlier versions of Pd, but should work now, otherwise use [table $1-sample])
This way you can reuse the abstraction and any changes, enhancements or bug fixes you make in one of the sample players will automatically be done in the other players, too.
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
_ __latest track: fqdn _ http://footils.org/cms/show/38