dear list,
i ran into some trouble with the new features of [soundfiler]
recently. It does not output the samplerate of .wave files correctly
(haven't tried .aiff yet). With 96kHz files i got 30464, with 192kHz
files 60928. Iemlib/soundfile_info did gave me the correct samplerate
of the same soundfiles. So, is this a bug?
best,
Philipp
On 10/27/2017 04:47 PM, Philipp Schmalfuß wrote:
dear list,
i ran into some trouble with the new features of [soundfiler] recently. It does not output the samplerate of .wave files correctly (haven't tried .aiff yet). With 96kHz files i got 30464, with 192kHz files 60928. Iemlib/soundfile_info did gave me the correct samplerate of the same soundfiles. So, is this a bug?
could you send a (minimal) example soundfile that exposes the problem? (bear in mind that there's a quota on the mailinglist, with a maximum post size of 200kB or so)
gmrd IOhannes
Attached a 96khz wav file.
I'm getting the same troubles on win8.1 Pd 0.48-0.
--
Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.
On 10/27/2017 2:49 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 10/27/2017 04:47 PM, Philipp Schmalfuß wrote:
dear list,
i ran into some trouble with the new features of [soundfiler] recently. It does not output the samplerate of .wave files correctly (haven't tried .aiff yet). With 96kHz files i got 30464, with 192kHz files 60928. Iemlib/soundfile_info did gave me the correct samplerate of the same soundfiles. So, is this a bug?
could you send a (minimal) example soundfile that exposes the problem? (bear in mind that there's a quota on the mailinglist, with a maximum post size of 200kB or so)
gmrd IOhannes
Pd-list@lists.iem.atmailto:Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Seems that [soundfiler] only uses the last 15bits of the samplerate:
10111011100000000 (96000) nn111011100000000 (30464)
--
Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.
On 10/27/2017 3:21 PM, Lucas Cordiviola wrote:
Attached a 96khz wav file.
I'm getting the same troubles on win8.1 Pd 0.48-0.
--
Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.
On 10/27/2017 2:49 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 10/27/2017 04:47 PM, Philipp Schmalfuß wrote:
dear list,
i ran into some trouble with the new features of [soundfiler] recently. It does not output the samplerate of .wave files correctly (haven't tried .aiff yet). With 96kHz files i got 30464, with 192kHz files 60928. Iemlib/soundfile_info did gave me the correct samplerate of the same soundfiles. So, is this a bug?
could you send a (minimal) example soundfile that exposes the problem? (bear in mind that there's a quota on the mailinglist, with a maximum post size of 200kB or so)
gmrd IOhannes
Pd-list@lists.iem.atmailto:Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.atmailto:Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
i've attached some 500ms .wave of whitenoise, recorded in pd at 96kHz.
[soundfiler] outputs 30464 44 2 2 l with this.
This is pd 0.48.0 -64bit on windows 10
best,
Philipp
Zitat von IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at:
On 10/27/2017 04:47 PM, Philipp Schmalfuß wrote:
dear list,
i ran into some trouble with the new features of [soundfiler] recently. It does not output the samplerate of .wave files correctly (haven't tried .aiff yet). With 96kHz files i got 30464, with 192kHz files 60928. Iemlib/soundfile_info did gave me the correct samplerate of the same soundfiles. So, is this a bug?
could you send a (minimal) example soundfile that exposes the problem? (bear in mind that there's a quota on the mailinglist, with a maximum post size of 200kB or so)
gmrd IOhannes
-
IOhannes m zmölnig -
Lucas Cordiviola -
Philipp Schmalfuß