Hi Richard, you can read this: http://puredata.hurleur.com/sujet-1181-spigot
cheers
Marco
Message: 5 Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:26:26 +0100 From: Richard Bowers richard.bowers@ntlworld.com Subject: [PD] spigot~ info please To: PD-list@iem.at Message-ID: 4A9D9182.2020308@ntlworld.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi.
I'm having trouble locating info re spigot~. It isn't recognised in my Windows version of PD extended (Pd version 0.41.4-extended). Can anyone enlighten me, please?
Thanks,
Richard.
once again, here is my abstraction that does everything exactly as the [spigot~] object does.
if someone would like to include this in the 'extra' folder for pd-extended, it may be helpful to a few people.
Many thanks for your help, guys.
--Richard
hard off wrote:
once again, here is my abstraction that does everything exactly as the [spigot~] object does.
if someone would like to include this in the 'extra' folder for pd-extended, it may be helpful to a few people.
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.75/2341 - Release Date: 09/02/09 05:50:00
maybe it's better if you send it to hans, or commit it yourself to your
externals folder?
once again, here is my abstraction that does everything exactly as the [spigot~] object does.
if someone would like to include this in the 'extra' folder for
pd-extended, it may be helpful to a few people.
João Pais wrote:
maybe it's better if you send it to hans, or commit it yourself to your externals folder?
hans is reading the list so it has already been sent to him. apart from that, i think that people should stop using [spigot~]:
- it does something different than [spigot], so it's name is confusing.
(how about [demultiplex~] or [demux~]? this name is already taken by zexy, but low and behold, zexy's [demux~] without arguments is compatible!)
- a [spigot~] that is used a signal replacement for [spigot] can also be
written as [*~]. the latter is shorter to write (why does nobody complain about the missing [multiplication~] object?) and does not trick the user into believing that signal-processing is paused (and cpu-cycles are freed) ([spigot~] is not [switch~])
fmnadsr IOhannes
apart from that, i think that people should stop using [spigot~]:
yes and i will call 'unauthorized' 'prohibited' from now on.
it's not because i don't use Gem that i'm allowed to say : don't use Gem.
- it does something different than [spigot], so it's name is confusing
??
On Sep 6, 2009, at 9:27 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
João Pais wrote:
maybe it's better if you send it to hans, or commit it yourself to
your externals folder?hans is reading the list so it has already been sent to him. apart from that, i think that people should stop using [spigot~]:
If you want this Hans to look at patches, you're best bet is to submit
them to the patch tracker. Anything else is a gamble :)
.hc
- it does something different than [spigot], so it's name is
confusing. (how about [demultiplex~] or [demux~]? this name is
already taken by zexy, but low and behold, zexy's [demux~] without
arguments is compatible!)
- a [spigot~] that is used a signal replacement for [spigot] can
also be written as [*~]. the latter is shorter to write (why does
nobody complain about the missing [multiplication~] object?) and
does not trick the user into believing that signal-processing is
paused (and cpu-cycles are freed) ([spigot~] is not [switch~])fmnadsr IOhannes
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to
realize his wishes. Now that he can realize them, he must either
change them, or perish. -William Carlos Williams
-
Hans-Christoph Steiner -
hard off -
IOhannes m zmölnig -
João Pais -
Marco Donnarumma -
Richard Bowers -
ydegoyon＠gmail.com