hi all. i´ve bought a korg nano koltrol device. i´d like to use it with pd. hid seems to don´t wok. any ideas ? thanks jm
it doesn't work? perhaps it is broken then.
Jurgen
On Nov 16, 2009, at 11:18 PM, Jose Ramia wrote:
hi all. i´ve bought a korg nano koltrol device. i´d like to use it with pd. hid seems to don´t wok. any ideas ? thanks jm
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Yes.... works... see my blog in the signature.... i make a video....
Best regards
José
2009/11/16 Frank Barknecht fbar@footils.org
Hallo, Jose Ramia hat gesagt: // Jose Ramia wrote:
i´ve bought a korg nano koltrol device. i´d like to use it with pd. hid seems to don´t wok. any ideas ?
I think, it's a midi device, so you should use the midi objects like [ctlin].
Ciao
Frank
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
All the Korg Nanos work fine with PD. Select your MIDI devices in the
Preferences, open testtone.pd and you can see the MIDI messages.
/Mikael
On 16 Nov 2009, at 16:43, Jose Luis Santorcuato wrote:
Yes.... works... see my blog in the signature.... i make a video....
Best regards
José
2009/11/16 Frank Barknecht fbar@footils.org Hallo, Jose Ramia hat gesagt: // Jose Ramia wrote:
i´ve bought a korg nano koltrol device. i´d like to use it with pd. hid seems to don´t wok. any ideas ?
I think, it's a midi device, so you should use the midi objects like
[ctlin].Ciao
Frank
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-- http://www.chilemigra.cl http://arselectronicachile.blogspot.com http://www.myspace.com/santorcuato
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
thanks a lot for helping. it works with ctlin. but is any efficent way to avoid clicks when i move the faders of the controler? thanks again
From: Jose Luis Santorcuato santorcuato76@gmail.com To: pd-list@iem.at Sent: Mon, 16 November, 2009 17:43:48 Subject: Re: [PD] korg nano kontrol vs pure data
Yes.... works... see my blog in the signature.... i make a video....
Best regards
José
2009/11/16 Frank Barknecht fbar@footils.org
Hallo,
Jose Ramia hat gesagt: // Jose Ramia wrote:
i´ve bought a korg nano koltrol device. i´d like to use it with pd. hid seems to don´t wok. any ideas ?
I think, it's a midi device, so you should use the midi objects like [ctlin].
Ciao
Frank
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hey Jose
Yes, there is,
[Ctlin] | [pack f 10] (you might want to experiment with this) | [line~]
Then your arithmetic etc.
This basically provides ten milliseconds of interpolation whenever the controller is changed. Too short to noticably change the speed of a fade but it gets rid of the clicks.
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:08:04 +0000 From: josemariaramia@yahoo.co.uk To: pd-list@iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] korg nano kontrol vs pure data
thanks a lot for helping.it works with ctlin.but is any efficent way to avoid clicks when i move the faders of the controler?thanks again
From: Jose Luis Santorcuato santorcuato76@gmail.com To: pd-list@iem.at Sent: Mon, 16 November, 2009 17:43:48 Subject: Re: [PD] korg nano kontrol vs pure data
Yes.... works... see my blog in the signature.... i make a video.... Best regards José
2009/11/16 Frank Barknecht fbar@footils.org
Hallo,
Jose Ramia hat gesagt: // Jose Ramia wrote:
i´ve bought a korg nano koltrol device.
i´d like to use it with pd.
hid seems to don´t wok.
any ideas ?
I think, it's a midi device, so you should use the midi objects like [ctlin].
Ciao
--
Frank
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Jose Ramia wrote:
thanks a lot for helping. it works with ctlin. but is any efficent way to avoid clicks when i move the faders of the controler? thanks again
Are the clicks happening because of a parameter change? If so, a [line] object can be used to smooth out transitions between values. IE
[ctlin 1] | [$1 50< | [line] | [mtof] | [osc~]
Quoting "Justin Glenn Smith" noisesmith@gmail.com:
[ctlin 1] | [$1 50< | [line] | [mtof] | [osc~]
it's interesting how people stick to this approach!
what it will actually produce is a series of inconsistencies (aka
"clicks"; in our case: steps|
) every 64 samples.
if you are lucky, the inconssistenies will be small enough to notice.
however chances are quite big that you _will_ notice.
if you want to avoid audio clicks, you should create your lines in
audio domain and not in message domain
[ctlin 1] | [pack 0 50] | [line~] | [mtof~] | [osc~]
or, if there was no signal version of [mtof], something like:
[ctlin 1] | [pack 0 50] | [line] | [mtof] | [pack 0 10] | [line~] | [osc~]
mfgadr IOhannes
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Hallo, zmoelnig@iem.at hat gesagt: // zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
Quoting "Justin Glenn Smith" noisesmith@gmail.com:
[ctlin 1] | [$1 50< | [line] | [mtof] | [osc~]
it's interesting how people stick to this approach! what it will actually produce is a series of inconsistencies (aka
"clicks"; in our case: steps| ) every 64 samples.
Acutally the steps happen every 20 milliseconds, which is the default update rate of [line] (undocumented in line's help file, I checked with [timer]).
Frank
Quoting "Frank Barknecht" fbar@footils.org:
it's interesting how people stick to this approach! what it will actually produce is a series of inconsistencies (aka "clicks"; in our case: steps| ) every 64 samples.
Acutally the steps happen every 20 milliseconds, which is the default update rate of [line] (undocumented in line's help file, I checked with [timer]).
right.
but even if you specify a grainsize of 0.1ms, feeding the output of
[line] will take effect only at block-boundaries (unless you use the
"v" family of objects), which is usually 64 samples.
fgmasdr IOhannes
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
zmoelnig@iem.at a écrit :
Quoting "Justin Glenn Smith" noisesmith@gmail.com:
[ctlin 1] | [$1 50< | [line] | [mtof] | [osc~]
it's interesting how people stick to this approach! what it will actually produce is a series of inconsistencies (aka "clicks"; in our case: steps| ) every 64 samples.
it's worst than that : it should create "clicks" every 20ms, since that's the default line output rate!
c
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
or, if there was no signal version of [mtof]
Then you could make one:
[inlet~] | [*~ 0.0577623] | [exp~] | [*~ 8.1758] | [outlet~]
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801
Quoting "Mathieu Bouchard" matju@artengine.ca:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
or, if there was no signal version of [mtof]
Then you could make one:
i was trying to give advice how to handle a msg-only blackbox.
mfg.asdr IOhannes
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
Quoting "Mathieu Bouchard" matju@artengine.ca:
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
or, if there was no signal version of [mtof]
Then you could make one:
i was trying to give advice how to handle a msg-only blackbox.
I was trying to say something else.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801