hi, this thread might provide some answers:
http://processing.org/discourse/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=Programs;action=display;...
apparently java won't be able to be integrated fully until the next release, osc/midi suppport is in the works. someone on the thread suggested using serial between the 2 but i guess that might be too much hassle
would be interested to hear if you get something working
cheers
rene.
i'd be very interested
From: 0001@ooo000ooo.org To: pd-list@iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] PD + Processing Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:08:36 GMT
hi there. I tried this some time ago.it's very easy to use the built in net functions in processing to talk to netreceive (the other way pd-
processing doesn't seem so trivial)
In the other hand you can easily call any java code from within processing. I tested JavaOSC with supercollider and found no problems,I guess it should work with pd as well.
regards,
gerard
Oh, actually that applet talks to a Perl script that talks to PD but should be just as functional if the socket is connected to a PD netsend. All the Perl script does is turn netreceive and netsend into a single bi-directional socket.
-- Pall Thayer artist/teacher http://www.this.is/pallit http://130.208.220.190/ http://130.208.220.190/nuharm http://130.208.220.190/panse
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
*:-.,_,.-:*'
'*:-.,_,.-:*''*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_:-.,_,.-:**:-.,_,.Register your domain names now at Wyith.net http://www.wyith.net
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
E-mail just got a whole lot better. New ninemsn Premium. Click here
http://ninemsn.com.au/premium/landing.asp
I don't know much about OSC. Nothing really. I also haven't tried making PD send something to proce55ing yet but here are a couple of things I can tell you. Making proce55ing talk to PD is simple, mainly because netreceive is a listening socket, waiting for connections. One of the main things to keep in mind is that you have to manually terminate any message sent with a semi-colon. For instance:
netWrite("55"); //will not work because PD doesn't know that the message is finished and it's now supposed to do something with it.
netWrite("55;"); //will work. netWrite(myVar + ";"); //will work.
Another thing that complicates matters is that proce55ing seems to have problems with keeping sockets open. If you open a socket, send something and then try to send something else, you run into all sorts of problems. If you open a socket, send something, close it and then open another for the next message etc. It's OK. I don't know how this will go over on a real network however.
After trying for quite some time to send data from PD to proce55ing, I've come to the conclusion that there's a problem there with the terminating character. Proce55ing doesn't appear to realize when PD has finished its message. This is based on the fact that if I connect (no problems there) and then send a message, proce55ing won't let me disconnect. However, if I connect and then disconnect without sending anything, proce55ing will display a message stating that the client has disconnected.
So there, that's what I know about it.
Pall Thayer artist/teacher Fjolbrautaskolinn vid Armula http://www.this.is/pallit http://www.this.is/pallit/isjs http://www.this.is/pallit/harmony http://130.208.220.190/panse
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rene Christen" nay_m_c@hotmail.com To: pd-list@iem.at Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 10:32 PM Subject: Re: [PD] PD + Processing
hi, this thread might provide some answers:
http://processing.org/discourse/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=Programs;action=display;...
apparently java won't be able to be integrated fully until the next
release,
osc/midi suppport is in the works. someone on the thread suggested using serial between the 2 but i guess that might be too much hassle
would be interested to hear if you get something working
cheers
rene.
i'd be very interested
From: 0001@ooo000ooo.org To: pd-list@iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] PD + Processing Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:08:36 GMT
hi there. I tried this some time ago.it's very easy to use the built in net functions in processing to talk to netreceive (the other way pd-
processing doesn't seem so trivial)
In the other hand you can easily call any java code from within processing. I tested JavaOSC with supercollider and found no problems,I guess it should work with pd as well.
regards,
gerard
Oh, actually that applet talks to a Perl script that talks to PD but should be just as functional if the socket is connected to a PD
netsend.
All the Perl script does is turn netreceive and netsend into a single bi-directional socket.
-- Pall Thayer artist/teacher http://www.this.is/pallit http://130.208.220.190/ http://130.208.220.190/nuharm http://130.208.220.190/panse
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
*:-.,_,.-:*'
'*:-.,_,.-:*''*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_:-.,_,.-:**:-.,_,.Register your domain names now at Wyith.net http://www.wyith.net
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
E-mail just got a whole lot better. New ninemsn Premium. Click here http://ninemsn.com.au/premium/landing.asp
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 12:14:30AM +0000, Pall Thayer wrote:
Another thing that complicates matters is that proce55ing seems to have problems with keeping sockets open.
That's a key problem. Unless you can't solve this problem, any kludge is basically useless. For local communications, on the same computer or on the same LAN, it's more important, because UDP would be the favored transmission mode.
I don't know much about Java (I prefer not to use it because its proprietary), but I think networking should be reliable.
-- Marc
Well yes, of course networking should be reliable. Otherwise it's basically useless. Java of course has everything necessary for reliable networking, no problems there. Proce55ing however, is still in alpha and they don't try to hide the fact that it's still in developement and mention themselves that they're still working on proper socket implementations. It shows a lot of promise.
Pall ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc Lavallée" odradek@videotron.ca To: "Pall Thayer" palli@pallit.lhi.is Cc: pd-list@iem.at Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 8:47 PM Subject: Re: [PD] PD + Processing
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 12:14:30AM +0000, Pall Thayer wrote:
Another thing that complicates matters is that proce55ing seems to have problems with keeping sockets open.
That's a key problem. Unless you can't solve this problem, any kludge is basically useless. For local communications, on the same computer or on the same LAN, it's more important, because UDP would be the favored transmission mode.
I don't know much about Java (I prefer not to use it because its proprietary), but I think networking should be reliable.
-- Marc
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
-
Marc Lavallée -
Pall Thayer -
Rene Christen