ola,
what is the question?
i _never_ work on windows and i'm not going to the mac donald's, no thank you.
saludos, sevy
Richard Graham wrote:
Hi Sevy,
I have a few people testing my system on windows, and of course this includes the new compile for Grid (0.9). is it possible to receive a compile for Windows also?
You can see the finished system here: http://rickygraham.com/pages/pd2live
Thanks again for all your help,
Ricky
On 20 Jul 2011, at 11:04, wrote:
yes, works perfectly now. thank you and best wishes!
ricky
On 20 Jul 2011, at 07:19, ydegoyon@gmail.com wrote:
ola,
update your copy, it should work now..
but don't forget that if you want to work between [-1.1] the steps for x and y has to be set to a value like 0.01 ( precision of pd ).
saludos, sevy
Richard Graham wrote:
Hi Sevy,
Attached is the compiled version of [grid] 0.9 for Mac OSX. Unfortunately, the bug is still a problem here. When moving the point about in the grid manually, the output grid co-ordinates are correct but if I send [values 0, 0( it outputs 1,1 like before (on a grid -1 to 1 on both axis). Any ideas why this might be?
Thanks in advance,
Ricky
The version of [grid] in unauthorized in pure-data SVN and included in Pd-extended works on Windows. If there is a bug in it, please file a bug report.
.hc
On Mar 2, 2012, at 8:03 AM, ydegoyon@gmail.com wrote:
ola,
what is the question?
i _never_ work on windows and i'm not going to the mac donald's, no thank you.
saludos, sevy
Richard Graham wrote:
Hi Sevy,
I have a few people testing my system on windows, and of course this includes the new compile for Grid (0.9). is it possible to receive a compile for Windows also?
You can see the finished system here: http://rickygraham.com/pages/pd2live
Thanks again for all your help,
Ricky
On 20 Jul 2011, at 11:04, wrote:
yes, works perfectly now. thank you and best wishes!
ricky
On 20 Jul 2011, at 07:19, ydegoyon@gmail.com wrote:
ola,
update your copy, it should work now..
but don't forget that if you want to work between [-1.1] the steps for x and y has to be set to a value like 0.01 ( precision of pd ).
saludos, sevy
Richard Graham wrote:
Hi Sevy,
Attached is the compiled version of [grid] 0.9 for Mac OSX. Unfortunately, the bug is still a problem here. When moving the point about in the grid manually, the output grid co-ordinates are correct but if I send [values 0, 0( it outputs 1,1 like before (on a grid -1 to 1 on both axis). Any ideas why this might be?
Thanks in advance,
Ricky
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
"Free software means you control what your computer does. Non-free software means someone else controls that, and to some extent controls you." - Richard M. Stallman
Hello,
what's wrong with pd-extended release of grid on windows?
Colet Patrice
PS: I don't eat meat nor supermarket veggies, unless some ignoramus put it on my plate...
----- Mail original -----
De: ydegoyon@gmail.com À: "Richard Graham" Graham-R9@email.ulster.ac.uk, "PD List" pd-list@iem.at Envoyé: Vendredi 2 Mars 2012 17:03:59 Objet: Re: [PD] Grid (Pd)
ola,
what is the question?
i _never_ work on windows and i'm not going to the mac donald's, no thank you.
saludos, sevy
Richard Graham wrote:
Hi Sevy,
I have a few people testing my system on windows, and of course this includes the new compile for Grid (0.9). is it possible to receive a compile for Windows also?
You can see the finished system here: http://rickygraham.com/pages/pd2live
Thanks again for all your help,
Ricky
On 20 Jul 2011, at 11:04, wrote:
yes, works perfectly now. thank you and best wishes!
ricky
On 20 Jul 2011, at 07:19, ydegoyon@gmail.com wrote:
ola,
update your copy, it should work now..
but don't forget that if you want to work between [-1.1] the steps for x and y has to be set to a value like 0.01 ( precision of pd ).
saludos, sevy
Richard Graham wrote:
Hi Sevy,
Attached is the compiled version of [grid] 0.9 for Mac OSX. Unfortunately, the bug is still a problem here. When moving the point about in the grid manually, the output grid co-ordinates are correct but if I send [values 0, 0( it outputs 1,1 like before (on a grid -1 to 1 on both axis). Any ideas why this might be?
Thanks in advance,
Ricky
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-
Hans-Christoph Steiner -
Patrice Colet -
ydegoyon＠gmail.com