hey folks,
With [FIR~] you can draw in a graph to make the eq the way you want it.
I don't understand [FIR~], but it does neat sounding things.
I'm wondering if I can draw inside of a graph and control [equalizer] which eventually controls [biquad~] (because there is no way i'm capable of understanding [biquad~] at this point in time) just like the way [FIR~] works?
some of you may think, why don't i just use [FIR~] .... well [FIR~] seems to sound a lot different than [equalizer] & [biquad~]. it seems to have some kind of phasing in it for one. i also haven't figured out how to get it to 'cut' when i go 'negative' into the graph.. it seems to not get any quiter, but louder. i know i'm not understanding how it works.
the only way i can get a graph readout of what [equalizer] and [biquad~] do now is if i use filtergraph.pd (i forget who wrote it).. but it sweeps from 20Hz to 20kHz.. and outputs a response into a graph from that. this is awesome!! accept it takes a while, and i imagine it's not the most cpu friendly thing.
-andy
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 02:15:26PM -0500, andy graybeal wrote:
hey folks, With [FIR~] you can draw in a graph to make the eq the way you want it.
I don't understand [FIR~], but it does neat sounding things.I'm wondering if I can draw inside of a graph and control [equalizer] which eventually controls [biquad~] (because there is no way i'm capable of understanding [biquad~] at this point in time) just like the way [FIR~] works?
some of you may think, why don't i just use [FIR~] .... well [FIR~] seems to sound a lot different than [equalizer] & [biquad~]. it seems to have some kind of phasing in it for one. i also haven't figured out how to get it to 'cut' when i go 'negative' into the graph.. it seems to not get any quiter, but louder. i know i'm not understanding how it works.
the only way i can get a graph readout of what [equalizer] and [biquad~] do now is if i use filtergraph.pd (i forget who wrote it).. but it
i cant find filtergraph.pd, but i made something similar since biquad on its own is useless (unless youre a scientist, maybe).. http://whats-your.name/pd/gui/eq.png
sweeps from 20Hz to 20kHz.. and outputs a response into a graph from that. this is awesome!! accept it takes a while, and i imagine it's not the most cpu friendly thing.
-andy
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list