Hi
Thanks, yes wanted to see if it was compatible at your end- just to give some brief feedback,-I have actually been using Gridflow + vanilla Pd 0.43-0 (test 3) on Ubuntu and it works mostly. The big issue for me was the help index, which would completely crash PD when selected, but PD 0.43 is a test release I suppose. So for me, other than the help index (and perhaps some examples which crashed PD) it is usable
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Mathieu Bouchard matju@artengine.ca wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, ALAN BROOKER wrote:
tried quickly L2Ork with Gridflow 9.14 and both are working great-big thanks :)
I haven't done any testing nor debugging with L20rk, and AFAIK, I haven't fixed anything that caused a problem with L20rk. This means that the bug is probably still there, and might pop in your face, probably only in a future release. This is unless I fixed it by accident.
Off topic Mathieu but has Gridflow 9.14 been tested with the vanilla Pd 0.43-0 test versions?
It's been tried and it doesn't work. It's currently hard to debug, so, I want to make some big changes to the [doc_...] abstractions to make it easier to put my finger on the bug. Either that or hack pd again so that it tells me real error messages in those circumstances.
_______________________________________________________________________ | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, ALAN BROOKER wrote:
Thanks, yes wanted to see if it was compatible at your end- just to give some brief feedback,-I have actually been using Gridflow + vanilla Pd 0.43-0 (test 3) on Ubuntu and it works mostly. The big issue for me was the help index, which would completely crash PD when selected, but PD 0.43 is a test release I suppose. So for me, other than the help index (and perhaps some examples which crashed PD) it is usable
Well, that 0.43 is a test release is not a reason to leave it like that, it's one more reason to have it fixed quickly.
But GF's TODO list is large and is only getting larger.
OTOH, I've already finished the work of getting GEM 93 and GEM 92 compatibility at once in the same binaries... regardless of how many people think that it's not important or too much trouble to get it working. (That was last year already)
GF<->GEM bridge for Win32 is another tough compatibility topic whose time is coming. (We once had it working, but it was a brittle GEM92-only hack)
| Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC
-
ALAN BROOKER -
Mathieu Bouchard