Chances are Jonathan has already cleaned that up :D (Thanks for all the help file updates J!)
On Jan 19, 2014, at 6:00 AM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
From: Pall Thayer pallthay@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PD] signal math explanation Date: January 18, 2014 at 2:48:04 PM EST To: Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com Cc: pd-list pd-list@iem.at, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at
I don't know. I recall seeing it somewhere years ago.
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com wrote: Hi Pall, Which help patches? I haven't seen a single help patch that substitutes strings of [+~] to double the incoming signal where a simple multiplication would do.
I have seen cascades of [+~] for additive synthesis, but that's not the same.
Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com
this whole thread is about a typo?
i have never seen
[sig~]
|
[+~]
|
[+~]
but have often seen
[sig~]
|
[*~]
|
[+~]
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Dan Wilcox danomatika@gmail.com wrote:
Chances are Jonathan has already cleaned that up :D (Thanks for all the help file updates J!)
On Jan 19, 2014, at 6:00 AM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
*From: *Pall Thayer pallthay@gmail.com *Subject: **Re: [PD] signal math explanation* *Date: *January 18, 2014 at 2:48:04 PM EST *To: *Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com *Cc: *pd-list pd-list@iem.at, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at
I don't know. I recall seeing it somewhere years ago.
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Pall, Which help patches? I haven't seen a single help patch that substitutes strings of [+~] to double the incoming signal where a simple multiplication would do.
I have seen cascades of [+~] for additive synthesis, but that's not the same.
Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
oh and of course, i made a typo myself!
that last [+~] should be a [*~]
doh!
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:24 AM, i go bananas hard.off@gmail.com wrote:
this whole thread is about a typo?
i have never seen
[sig~] |
[+~] |
[+~]but have often seen
[sig~] |
[*~] |
[+~]On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Dan Wilcox danomatika@gmail.com wrote:
Chances are Jonathan has already cleaned that up :D (Thanks for all the help file updates J!)
On Jan 19, 2014, at 6:00 AM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
*From: *Pall Thayer pallthay@gmail.com *Subject: **Re: [PD] signal math explanation* *Date: *January 18, 2014 at 2:48:04 PM EST *To: *Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com *Cc: *pd-list pd-list@iem.at, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at
I don't know. I recall seeing it somewhere years ago.
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Pall, Which help patches? I haven't seen a single help patch that substitutes strings of [+~] to double the incoming signal where a simple multiplication would do.
I have seen cascades of [+~] for additive synthesis, but that's not the same.
Dan Wilcox @danomatika danomatika.com robotcowboy.com
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-
Dan Wilcox -
i go bananas