Dear friends i am working now with GEM, and i like use a lot of images and planes,the question... if i use the gemhead with -1 [gemhead-1] then [gemhead -2] the gemhead -2 is a background? i can work with alpha... but.. i want work like a layer... Thanks a lot
José
Hi,
if i use the gemhead with -1 [gemhead-1] then [gemhead -2] the gemhead -2 is a background? i can work with alpha... but.. i want work like a layer...
No it is not a 'background', if you want to work with backgrounds, you have to displace your object using [translateXYZ] for example... [gemhead -2] is simply render after [gemhead -1] so because of that [gemhead -2] could be transparent (apply some alpha effect) over [gemhead -1] but not the inverse...
for more help have a look at [gemhead] help, all you want to know is explained.
p.
Jose Luis Santorcuato wrote:
Dear friends i am working now with GEM, and i like use a lot of images and planes,the question... if i use the gemhead with -1 [gemhead-1] then [gemhead -2] the gemhead -2 is a background? i can work with alpha... but.. i want work like a layer... Thanks a lot
from [gemhead]s help-patch for negatvie render-orders: "Note, that Higher values (-3) will be rendered BEFORE higher values (-10)."
read: layer "-5" will be drawn before layer "-10", the later rednering will overpainting pixels of the prior.
fgamsdr IOhannes
Le mercredi 14 octobre 2009 à 19:32 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit :
IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
from [gemhead]s help-patch for negatvie render-orders: "Note, that Higher values (-3) will be rendered BEFORE higher values (-10)."
HIGHER values are rendered before HIGHER value???
:) 1 before 50 before 99 before -1 before -50 before -99. So higher values (-3) will be rendered before lower values (-10) ;) ++
Jack
cyrille
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Yes, the problem isnt the alpha or rotates... is the order of render.... for working in many planes.... thanks a lot friends for the support. Cheers from Chile
JOsé
2009/10/14 Jack jack@rybn.org
Le mercredi 14 octobre 2009 à 19:32 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit :
IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
from [gemhead]s help-patch for negatvie render-orders: "Note, that Higher values (-3) will be rendered BEFORE higher values (-10)."
HIGHER values are rendered before HIGHER value???
:) 1 before 50 before 99 before -1 before -50 before -99. So higher values (-3) will be rendered before lower values (-10) ;) ++
Jack
cyrille
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Jack a écrit :
Le mercredi 14 octobre 2009 à 19:32 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit :
IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
from [gemhead]s help-patch for negatvie render-orders: "Note, that Higher values (-3) will be rendered BEFORE higher values (-10)."
HIGHER values are rendered before HIGHER value???
:) 1 before 50 before 99 before -1 before -50 before -99.
i know what the rendering order is. i just find this sentence very confusing.
So higher values (-3) will be rendered before lower values (-10) ;)
this one look better.
c
++
Jack
cyrille
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Le mercredi 14 octobre 2009 à 22:00 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit :
Jack a écrit :
Le mercredi 14 octobre 2009 à 19:32 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit :
IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
from [gemhead]s help-patch for negatvie render-orders: "Note, that Higher values (-3) will be rendered BEFORE higher values (-10)."
HIGHER values are rendered before HIGHER value???
:) 1 before 50 before 99 before -1 before -50 before -99.
i know what the rendering order is. i just find this sentence very confusing.
Yes, i know that you know :) it was not for you, but an answer for Jose ;) About that, there is still an error in the gemhead example. How can i correct this ? (if i can). ++
Jack
So higher values (-3) will be rendered before lower values (-10) ;)
this one look better.
c
++
Jack
cyrille
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Jack a écrit :
About that, there is still an error in the gemhead example. How can i correct this ? (if i can).
i just did it c
++
Jack
So higher values (-3) will be rendered before lower values (-10) ;)
this one look better.
c
++
Jack
cyrille
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Jack a écrit :
About that, there is still an error in the gemhead example. How can i correct this ? (if i can).
i just did it
Ok, good ! ++
Jack
c
++
Jack
So higher values (-3) will be rendered before lower values (-10) ;)
this one look better.
c
++
Jack
cyrille
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Thanks brothers i am very happy with GEM. In the old times i use Jitter... but Gem is powerfull.... i will upload a new videos.... Thanks from Chile
José
2009/10/14 cyrille henry ch@chnry.net
IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
from [gemhead]s help-patch for negatvie render-orders: "Note, that
Higher values (-3) will be rendered BEFORE higher values (-10)."
HIGHER values are rendered before HIGHER value???
cyrille