hi all,
i tried out the munger~ object, but it takes too much of cpu power, so i doubt, that it's working correctly one munger~ object needs about 200 percent of my cpu to run ... on a 2.5 GHz machine which seems to be a bit too high...
thnx...
Tim mailto:TimBlechmann@gmx.de ICQ: 96771783 http://www.nyds-exp-discogs.tk -- The only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn, like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars and in the middle you see the blue centerlight pop and everybody goes "Awww!" Jack Kerouac
Hallo, Tim Blechmann hat gesagt: // Tim Blechmann wrote:
i tried out the munger~ object, but it takes too much of cpu power, so i doubt, that it's working correctly one munger~ object needs about 200 percent of my cpu to run ... on a 2.5 GHz machine which seems to be a bit too high...
Shouldn't do that. I could think of two reasons: one would be, that munger is producing denormals on your CPU, which could be possible, because munger~ is a delay and thus could generate very small values.
But from my own experiments with munger I found, that it is very easy to give munger settings, that let it produce an insane amount of grains, that are really demanding on any CPU. I don't remember which settings produce this, but try inputting values < 1.
ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
hello dear list
I searched the archive, but didnt succed. So I ask again a simple question..
I wanna combine the bonk~ object with a toggle, because I want to start and finish something with a live-audio input (percussion sound). The best way I could think of was just to connect bonk~ with a bang and then with a toggle. But it doesnt work..
Please help..
thank you cheers miyazaki_s from basle www.netzknoten.net/miyazaki_s
you're patch works for me... i notice that taping on my laptop often sends two click sounds, so the toggle instantly turns on then off again... otherwise, are you sure you have "computer audio" on?
Shintaro Miyazaki wrote:
hello dear list
I searched the archive, but didnt succed. So I ask again a simple question..
I wanna combine the bonk~ object with a toggle, because I want to start and finish something with a live-audio input (percussion sound). The best way I could think of was just to connect bonk~ with a bang and then with a toggle. But it doesnt work..
Please help..
thank you cheers miyazaki_s from basle www.netzknoten.net/miyazaki_s
it works. but not always.. maybe it has something to do with the properties "flash-time in ms" intrrpt and hold, but I have no idea what it should mean..
Am 27.12.2003 um 02:46 schrieb Josh Steiner:
i notice that taping on my laptop often sends two click sounds, so the toggle instantly turns on then off again...
that shouldn't happen cause I narrowed the sensualitiy with max and min..
cheers miyazaki_s
Shintaro Miyazaki wrote:
it works. but not always.. maybe it has something to do with the properties "flash-time in ms" intrrpt and hold, but I have no idea what it should mean..
that just effects the visual flash speed, it doest change the actual behavior at the outlet... put a [print] after the bang and you should see that you are getting two bangs in rapid succession when you think its not working, and hence the toggles turns on, then off almost immediately.
Am 27.12.2003 um 02:46 schrieb Josh Steiner:
i notice that taping on my laptop often sends two click sounds, so the toggle instantly turns on then off again...
that shouldn't happen cause I narrowed the sensualitiy with max and min..
well... it does happen :)
good luck,
-josh
Hi Tim,
I just tried it, and got the same thing when I made one on the canvas. Using the one in the help file and sending it some input and messages fixed it, and it ran at 4-18%. But invoking it with no arguments, messages or inputs seems to cause trouble. Anybody's guess as to why. Try opening the one in the help file and sending it some messages to figure out which one is critical. I think my CPU useage went down after sending it a "position" variable....
That said, this object is really weird, and doesn't really seem to behave very well in the 10 or so minutes I just spent examining it. I have made a few granulated delay lines myself before, but this one doesn't seem to work as well as I would expect. Maybe better to DIY one?
best, D.
Tim Blechmann wrote:
hi all,
i tried out the munger~ object, but it takes too much of cpu power, so i doubt, that it's working correctly one munger~ object needs about 200 percent of my cpu to run ... on a 2.5 GHz machine which seems to be a bit too high...
-
derek holzer -
Frank Barknecht -
Josh Steiner -
Shintaro Miyazaki -
Tim Blechmann