Re: [PD] Editing CSS style, make pd.info better? [WAS: puredata.info site design provocation]
Also thought the same about the bottom icon bar, but it could be good if IOhannes could tell what we can use to replace those icons.
I'm afraid without the dotted background, the whole page would feel like floating, and content areas will be difficult to recognize.
Screen statistic would be good, actually, can we publicly see the statistics of the portal?
M
- i love the dotted background
- the bottom icon bar (iem-powered etc) is oldschool and shall go
- we may not need the accessibility link but some people do
- a bit afraid that fixed width may be a problem on some mobiles. btw: are
there some web stats for puredata.info that have screen size statistics?
2 cents, Andr?s
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2012-03-08 09:47, Marco Donnarumma wrote:
Also thought the same about the bottom icon bar, but it could be good if IOhannes could tell what we can use to replace those icons.
i'm not sure how i should answer this:
- technically, it's easy to remove/replace the colophon
- politically, i'm sure the iem would prefer to be mentioned prominently
Screen statistic would be good, actually, can we publicly see the statistics of the portal?
http://statistics.puredata.info
fgmasdr IOhannes
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 09:56, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2012-03-08 09:47, Marco Donnarumma wrote:
Also thought the same about the bottom icon bar, but it could be good if IOhannes could tell what we can use to replace those icons.
i'm not sure how i should answer this:
- technically, it's easy to remove/replace the colophon
- politically, i'm sure the iem would prefer to be mentioned prominently
I think the footer text, which says "*puredata.info and puredata.org is hosted and serviced by IEM and a contribution to the PD-community using Plone , see Impressum.*" is prominent and fair enough. It's just the icons which are out of style.
András
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 09:56, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote: [...]
Screen statistic would be good, actually, can we publicly see the statistics of the portal?
No screen stats there :( Google Analytics is pretty smart, and simple to implement. Some people have reservations, though. If you don't, it could be a valuable addition.
András
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2012-03-08 18:49, András Murányi wrote:
No screen stats there :(
i know.
Google Analytics is pretty smart, and simple to implement. Some people have reservations, though. If you don't, it could be a valuable addition.
actually, i do have reservations about google analytics.
fgamsdr IOhannes
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 19:01, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2012-03-08 18:49, András Murányi wrote:
No screen stats there :(
i know.
Google Analytics is pretty smart, and simple to implement. Some people
have
reservations, though. If you don't, it could be a valuable addition.
actually, i do have reservations about google analytics.
fgamsdr IOhannes
That's completely understandable. This one runs on the server, GPL, and has rather comparable functions: http://piwik.org/
NB we don't to set up web stats to know that 700+ pixels will be to wide for iPhones :) Good web stats are useful, however. Webalizer is old.
András
actually, i do have reservations about google analytics.
fgamsdr IOhannes
I don't know if Iohannes reservations are the same as mine, but +1 for the record. No need for thatkind of cheap marketing trash on our site.
-
András Murányi -
Andy Farnell -
IOhannes m zmoelnig -
Marco Donnarumma