I' m just trying out [initbang] downloaded from here https://git.iem.at/pd/iemguts but it doesn't bang on load of an abstraction... I'm using it with Pd-0.47-0 on Debian Jessie. The object compiled fine and is created, but I get no bang... there must be something I'm missing..
On 05/24/2016 04:31 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
I' m just trying out [initbang] downloaded from here https://git.iem.at/pd/iemguts but it doesn't bang on load of an abstraction... I'm using it with Pd-0.47-0 on Debian Jessie. The object compiled fine and is created, but I get no bang... there must be something I'm missing..
maybe this recent thread about [initbang]?
https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2016-05/114802.html
gf,dsar IOhannes
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:18 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
On 05/24/2016 04:31 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
I' m just trying out [initbang] downloaded from here https://git.iem.at/pd/iemguts but it doesn't bang on load of an abstraction... I'm using it with Pd-0.47-0 on Debian Jessie. The object compiled fine and is created, but I get no bang... there must be
something
I'm missing..
maybe this recent thread about [initbang]?
https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2016-05/114802.html
No, that won't do, because in my Pd, [initbang] won't send a bang inside an abstraction. Didn't try it in a subpatch, I need it (sort of) for abstractions...
On 05/24/2016 08:27 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:18 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
On 05/24/2016 04:31 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
I' m just trying out [initbang] downloaded from here https://git.iem.at/pd/iemguts but it doesn't bang on load of an abstraction... I'm using it with Pd-0.47-0 on Debian Jessie. The object compiled fine and is created, but I get no bang... there must be
something
I'm missing..
maybe this recent thread about [initbang]?
https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2016-05/114802.html
No, that won't do, because in my Pd, [initbang] won't send a bang inside an abstraction. Didn't try it in a subpatch, I need it (sort of) for abstractions...
the point about that thread was, that if you have an abstraction, and that abstraction contains a subpatch wherein the [initbang] object lives, then it won't get triggered. or put otherwise: the [initbang] object *must* be instantiated on the top-level of the abstraction.
btw, iemguts in Debian/stretch already has an iemguts that includes a working [initbang], so there is no need to compile it yourself (if you are on stretch).
gfmrdsa IOhannes
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:40 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
On 05/24/2016 08:27 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:18 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at
wrote:
On 05/24/2016 04:31 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
I' m just trying out [initbang] downloaded from here https://git.iem.at/pd/iemguts but it doesn't bang on load of an abstraction... I'm using it with Pd-0.47-0 on Debian Jessie. The object compiled fine and is created, but I get no bang... there must be
something
I'm missing..
maybe this recent thread about [initbang]?
https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2016-05/114802.html
No, that won't do, because in my Pd, [initbang] won't send a bang inside
an
abstraction. Didn't try it in a subpatch, I need it (sort of) for abstractions...
the point about that thread was, that if you have an abstraction, and that abstraction contains a subpatch wherein the [initbang] object lives, then it won't get triggered. or put otherwise: the [initbang] object *must* be instantiated on the top-level of the abstraction.
I see, I didn't give it much thought, apparently...
btw, iemguts in Debian/stretch already has an iemguts that includes a working [initbang], so there is no need to compile it yourself (if you are on stretch).
Nope, I'm on Jessie, doesn't matter now, I've compiled it..
On 05/24/2016 09:22 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:40 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
the point about that thread was, that if you have an abstraction, and that abstraction contains a subpatch wherein the [initbang] object lives, then it won't get triggered. or put otherwise: the [initbang] object *must* be instantiated on the top-level of the abstraction.
I see, I didn't give it much thought, apparently...
so did this fix your problem, or is it something else?
gfsmdar IOhannes
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:38 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
On 05/24/2016 09:22 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:40 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at
wrote:
the point about that thread was, that if you have an abstraction, and that abstraction contains a subpatch wherein the [initbang] object lives, then it won't get triggered. or put otherwise: the [initbang] object *must* be instantiated on the top-level of the abstraction.
I see, I didn't give it much thought, apparently...
so did this fix your problem, or is it something else?
Yes, it did. Sorry for not coming back here... thanks for the help.
-
Alexandros Drymonitis -
IOhannes m zmölnig