Hi,just checked with a friend who has both mac and win machines, and the results are ok on win, but wrong on mac. Can someone with the Linux OS try to open the patch and copy-paste here the 3 print lines from pd terminal window generated by the attached patch?
PS: interesting fact is that when I write the audio file to disk, pd terminal gives me info that the biggest amplitude in the file is the same as in table I am reading from. But when I load that file into new table, this is not the case anymore.Thank you for your help! Hrvoje Radnic http://soundcloud.com/sumovi-protiv-valova 00385(0)915225162
From: Claude Heiland-Allen <claude@mathr.co.uk>
To: pd-list@lists.iem.at Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 3:12 AM Subject: Re: [PD] Writing part of large table to file
Hi,
On 04/08/17 01:30, Hrvoje Radnic via Pd-list wrote:
I tried the patch on win10 machine and [soundfiler] works as expected. Now, it will be great if someone with Linux machine can confirm that [soundfiler] can't write audio files correctly, so I can report it.
The array-sound1.pd patch in this thread seems to work as expected here in pd-0.48test6 on 64bit Linux:
$ uname -a Linux frappuccino 4.9.0-3-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.30-2+deb9u2 (2017-06-26) x86_64 GNU/Linux $ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep model\ name | uniq -c 4 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) II X4 640 Processor
Didn't do much further testing.
Claude
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
OOps, forgot to include the patch Hrvoje Radnic http://soundcloud.com/sumovi-protiv-valova 00385(0)915225162
From: Hrvoje Radnic <hrvojeradnic@yahoo.com>
To: Claude Heiland-Allen claude@mathr.co.uk; "pd-list@lists.iem.at" pd-list@lists.iem.at Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 2:00 PM Subject: Re: [PD] Writing part of large table to file
Hi,just checked with a friend who has both mac and win machines, and the results are ok on win, but wrong on mac. Can someone with the Linux OS try to open the patch and copy-paste here the 3 print lines from pd terminal window generated by the attached patch?
PS: interesting fact is that when I write the audio file to disk, pd terminal gives me info that the biggest amplitude in the file is the same as in table I am reading from. But when I load that file into new table, this is not the case anymore.Thank you for your help! Hrvoje Radnic http://soundcloud.com/sumovi-protiv-valova 00385(0)915225162
From: Claude Heiland-Allen <claude@mathr.co.uk>
To: pd-list@lists.iem.at Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 3:12 AM Subject: Re: [PD] Writing part of large table to file
Hi,
On 04/08/17 01:30, Hrvoje Radnic via Pd-list wrote:
I tried the patch on win10 machine and [soundfiler] works as expected. Now, it will be great if someone with Linux machine can confirm that [soundfiler] can't write audio files correctly, so I can report it.
The array-sound1.pd patch in this thread seems to work as expected here in pd-0.48test6 on 64bit Linux:
$ uname -a Linux frappuccino 4.9.0-3-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.30-2+deb9u2 (2017-06-26) x86_64 GNU/Linux $ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep model\ name | uniq -c 4 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) II X4 640 Processor
Didn't do much further testing.
Claude
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hi,
On 04/08/17 13:01, Hrvoje Radnic wrote:
just checked with a friend who has both mac and win machines, and the results are ok on win, but wrong on mac. Can someone with the Linux OS try to open the patch and copy-paste here the 3 print lines from pd terminal window generated by the attached patch?
64bit linux as below, all seems ok:
last: 1 middle: 1 start: 1
*From:* Claude Heiland-Allen claude@mathr.co.uk $ uname -a Linux frappuccino 4.9.0-3-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.30-2+deb9u2 (2017-06-26) x86_64 GNU/Linux $ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep model\ name | uniq -c 4 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) II X4 640 Processor
Claude
Thanks for your input, Claude! I don't know how to explain this weirdness.This is my system specs:Linux sinewave 4.8.0-59-lowlatency #64-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Thu Jun 29 21:04:20 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
BTW, What's your version of pd? Cheers! Hrvoje Radnic http://soundcloud.com/sumovi-protiv-valova 00385(0)915225162
From: Claude Heiland-Allen <claude@mathr.co.uk>
To: "pd-list@lists.iem.at" pd-list@lists.iem.at Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 3:46 PM Subject: Re: [PD] Writing part of large table to file
Hi,
On 04/08/17 13:01, Hrvoje Radnic wrote:
just checked with a friend who has both mac and win machines, and the results are ok on win, but wrong on mac. Can someone with the Linux OS try to open the patch and copy-paste here the 3 print lines from pd terminal window generated by the attached patch?
64bit linux as below, all seems ok:
last: 1 middle: 1 start: 1
*From:* Claude Heiland-Allen claude@mathr.co.uk $ uname -a Linux frappuccino 4.9.0-3-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.30-2+deb9u2 (2017-06-26) x86_64 GNU/Linux $ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep model\ name | uniq -c 4 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) II X4 640 Processor
Claude
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hi!Just an update... With the newest version of pd (0.48.0) [soundfiler] is working fine. Cheers! Hrvoje Radnic http://soundcloud.com/sumovi-protiv-valova 00385(0)915225162
From: Hrvoje Radnic via Pd-list <pd-list@lists.iem.at>
To: Claude Heiland-Allen claude@mathr.co.uk; "pd-list@lists.iem.at" pd-list@lists.iem.at Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 5:24 PM Subject: Re: [PD] Writing part of large table to file
Thanks for your input, Claude! I don't know how to explain this weirdness.This is my system specs:Linux sinewave 4.8.0-59-lowlatency #64-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Thu Jun 29 21:04:20 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
BTW, What's your version of pd? Cheers! Hrvoje Radnic http://soundcloud.com/sumovi-protiv-valova 00385(0)915225162
From: Claude Heiland-Allen <claude@mathr.co.uk>
To: "pd-list@lists.iem.at" pd-list@lists.iem.at Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 3:46 PM Subject: Re: [PD] Writing part of large table to file
Hi,
On 04/08/17 13:01, Hrvoje Radnic wrote:
just checked with a friend who has both mac and win machines, and the results are ok on win, but wrong on mac. Can someone with the Linux OS try to open the patch and copy-paste here the 3 print lines from pd terminal window generated by the attached patch?
64bit linux as below, all seems ok:
last: 1 middle: 1 start: 1
*From:* Claude Heiland-Allen claude@mathr.co.uk $ uname -a Linux frappuccino 4.9.0-3-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.30-2+deb9u2 (2017-06-26) x86_64 GNU/Linux $ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep model\ name | uniq -c 4 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) II X4 640 Processor
Claude
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-
Claude Heiland-Allen -
Hrvoje Radnic