> I guess it's time to rewrite Pd completely in D.

Well, it's hard to take seriously a bug report where the proposed fix is to read
an abandoned branch from a repo.

If, however, you have an incremental approach to applying Tim's code to any
flavor of Pd, I'm all ears.

-Jonathan


On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 4:42 PM, Matt Barber <brbrofsvl@gmail.com> wrote:


I guess it's time to rewrite Pd completely in D.

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list <pd-list@lists.iem.at> wrote:
> However, I doubt anyone has ever completely debugged a program that uses threads.

To me, understanding threading is a bit like trying to understand quantum mechanics if quantum mechanics were implemented using threads

-Jonathan







On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 2:27 PM, Miller Puckette <msp@ucsd.edu> wrote:


I believe it's fixed now (with these lines in s_inter.c..

#ifdef THREAD_LOCKING
            sys_lock();
#endif
            (*sys_fdpoll[i].fdp_fn)(sys_fdpoll[i].fdp_ptr, sys_fdpoll[i].fdp_fd);
#ifdef THREAD_LOCKING
            sys_unlock();
#endif

)

However, I doubt anyone has ever completely debugged a program that uses
threads.

cheers
Miller

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 07:11:34PM +0000, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
> Hi list,Anybody have more information about this bug report:https://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/bugs/26/
> -Jonathan

> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list




_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list