I guess it's time to rewrite Pd completely in D.
Well, it's hard to take seriously a bug report where the proposed fix is to read an abandoned branch from a repo. If, however, you have an incremental approach to applying Tim's code to any flavor of Pd, I'm all ears.
-Jonathan
On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 4:42 PM, Matt Barber <brbrofsvl@gmail.com> wrote:
I guess it's time to rewrite Pd completely in D. On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list pd-list@lists.iem.at wrote:
However, I doubt anyone has ever completely debugged a program that uses threads.
To me, understanding threading is a bit like trying to understand quantum mechanics if quantum mechanics were implemented using threads -Jonathan
On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 2:27 PM, Miller Puckette <msp@ucsd.edu> wrote:
I believe it's fixed now (with these lines in s_inter.c..
#ifdef THREAD_LOCKING sys_lock(); #endif (*sys_fdpoll[i].fdp_fn)(sys_fdpoll[i].fdp_ptr, sys_fdpoll[i].fdp_fd); #ifdef THREAD_LOCKING sys_unlock(); #endif
)
However, I doubt anyone has ever completely debugged a program that uses threads.
cheers Miller
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 07:11:34PM +0000, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
Hi list,Anybody have more information about this bug report:https://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/bugs/26/ -Jonathan
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list