Alexandre, it's cool that you're out on 'bug hunt', however, on some things you could take a little more time to figure out if things are really a bug or just mistakes on our own.

You're wondering why the 'back' [print~] starts with 2111? The first 64 samples are from a previous block. Then from sample nr. 64, it starts from 1983, as expected.

Check my reply patch if you still have doubts.

Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. September 2015 um 02:10 Uhr
Von: "Alexandre Torres Porres" <porres@gmail.com>
An: "pd-list@lists.iem.at" <pd-list@lists.iem.at>
Betreff: [PD] more delay weirdness

wow, I'm still finding some weird things going on with delay lines and fft subpatches.

Find my newest issue in the attached patch. Now I have only [z~] as the delay line (but same happens with [delay~]).

So I have two patches: on the parent patch, [z~ 64] will act as a "back" window, and you can check it prints a block that is behind 64 samples indeed.

When it comes to the subpatch with a block of 256 and overlap of 4, the "front" window is not in the "front" anymore, but behind by 128 samples!!!

what the hell?

_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list