16 Jan
2005
16 Jan
'05
2:44 p.m.
--- Thomas Grill gr@grrrr.org wrote:
Hi Stefan, the reason is that (2/3) is treated as an integer division which yields 0. That's not really pd-like, where all numbers should be floats.... Anyway, try 2./3. best greetings, Thomas
Ok, very surprised I hadn't noticed that before. Thanks for clearing that up. As you say though, if the author is reading, maybe always using float division would be better..? I'm easily confused.
Stefan Turner
___________________________________________________________ ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com