ahh, right, i'd overlooked that it might be tooIOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> dmotd wrote:
>> i'm just looking at the license now and i'm not sure that this is
>> acutally a problem.. looks like an open style license.. not for resale,
>> non-commerical educaton use only, must credit authors and distribute
>> license.
>
> which sounds incompatible with GPL (which is what PdX is distributed under).
restrictive.. thats too bad. could it still be added
to the svn repository?
dmotd
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list