From: Rafael Vega via Pd-list <pd-list@lists.iem.at>Subject: Re: [PD] constantq~ - Thomas GrillDate: July 5, 2014 at 9:08:27 AM EDTTo: Federico Llach <federicollach@gmail.com>Cc: pd-list@lists.iem.at, Thomas Grill <gr@grrrr.org>Reply-To: email.rafa@gmail.comI guess homebrew installed a 64 bit version of the library, not a "universal" or "fat" binary that contains both 32 and 64 builds. Is the external compiled for 32 or 64? if 64, you could use pd-extended 64 and give that a try.On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Federico Llach <federicollach@gmail.com> wrote:Ok, that was a step forward—thanks Rafael! Now I do have a libfftw3f.3.dylib file in /usr/local/lib, which is a link file to /usr/local/Cellar/fftw/3.3.4/lib (this seems to be the way Homebrew deals with the installations).However, when I try to create the constantq~ object in Pd-extended I receive:/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/constantq~/constantq~.pd_darwin: dlopen(/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/constantq~/constantq~.pd_darwin, 10): Library not loaded: /usr/local/lib/libfftw3f.3.dylibReferenced from: /Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/constantq~/constantq~.pd_darwinReason: no suitable image found. Did find:/usr/local/lib/libfftw3f.3.dylib: mach-o, but wrong architecture/usr/local/lib/libfftw3f.3.dylib: mach-o, but wrong architectureI am reading as much as I can understand and—although I don't know much about this—my current thought is that I am in a 32/64 bit dilemma here (?). My processor is Intel Core i7, so according to Apple that is 64 bit. Related: since Thomas suggested I should do "single precision" installation, I used "brew install fftw --enable-sse2" which I thought enables single precision according to https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/blob/master/Library/Formula/fftw.rb . When that didn't work I uninstalled and just used "brew install fftw", with same results. Terminal session of this attached.I found this thread from this mailing list on "Wrong architecture" issues: http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2011-04/088265.htmlAny thoughts?