pdpedia is definitely searchable, just like wikipedia. I search it
often. I think some of the pdpedia content has fed to the FLOSS
Manuals Pure Data book, if not other things.
.hc
On Jun 13, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Loic KESSOUS wrote:
pdpedia is for me the closest thing to an object reference
documentation. But it's like one searchable file, like was (is? ) for example the
max reference manual pdf. pdpedia need to be updated, some stuff is missing, I did a few
contributions, but not as much as I should have done :) . I wonder how it could be possible to generate a reference manual
from it, could it be possible ?Loïc
Le 10 juin 2010 à 03:11, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :
ha! well said indeed! So that's what happened... Hans says years
later..hc
On Jun 7, 2010, at 7:21 AM, Derek Holzer wrote:
I have to say that 90% of the work I've contributed to Pd and the
FLOSS Manual has been motivated by a frustration with the current
state of affairs. That's how free-software projects trick you into
pouring your life away into them ;-)D.
On 6/7/10 11:55 AM, João Pais wrote:
further than that, there's this list, and also the pd chat. If
you're a professional, your help and insight could be very useful for the pd community, in case you want/can get involved. with this kind of projects, if you don't like something, *you* can make it better
to reach your standards.-- ::: derek holzer ::: http://macumbista.net ::: ---Oblique Strategy # 21: "Be less critical"
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
The arc of history bends towards justice. - Dr. Martin Luther
King, Jr.
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Programs should be written for people to read, and only incidentally
for machines to execute.
- from Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs