It is true that even the pure vanilla section of Purr Data is not 100% the same or compatible. I already mentioned how Purr Data doesn't carry yet all of the features from the latest Pd Vanilla (0.48) - though I know it'll get there eventually. Some of these considerations we're bringing here have to do with the Purr Data project being still relatively new. I'm expecting it to be more fully compatible.

But besides Purr Data not integrating all of vanilla yet, it also has some different functionalities of Vanilla's objects. Even regarding syntax, like being able to load $0 in messages (and boy, do I wish that was in Vanilla). So that can be tricky as well.

Anyway, I don't think is that bad to go ahead and use both ;)

cheers

2017-10-02 12:53 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list <pd-list@lists.iem.at>:
> Many of my patches that I developed on Pure Data don't run without
> modification in Purr Data. Some crash at loading, some look graphically
> weird

Typically, "crashers" and "freezers" get fixed pretty quick in Purr Data.

The only freezer I remember with one of your patches was due to a
broken object triggering an infinite loop in your patch's [until] object. I'm
pretty sure that was an alpha or beta version, and I'm pretty sure I fixed
whatever object it was that wouldn't create.

I don't see any other relevant crashers listed on the tracker:


What am I missing?

-Jonathan





_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list