Hi Frank,
thanks for the criticism. I once thought about using $0. However, as I understand it, $0 creates a unique number in abstractions only, not in subpatches. In fact, when I use your modified pm_scope and copy it, then $0 gives the same number for both instances. Am I missing something here?
Opting for subpatces instead of abstractions is a personal preference: I love it when everything is contained in just one file. Try to look at things you did 5 years ago on a completely different system, and you know what I mean.
--Matthias
Frank Barknecht schrieb:
Hallo, Matthias Blau hat gesagt: // Matthias Blau wrote:
PureMeasurement is a collection of pd-patches (requiring iemlib) aimed at providing students and researchers with tools to perform acoustical measurements using audio interfaces.
One word: WOW!
(More words as minor criticism: I would prefer local variables in the tools-patches, though. They are not necessary for the "applications", as one would normally not use two instances, but for the tools this could be common. I attached a version of pm_scope.pd where I replaced the globals with "$0-" versions.)
Ciao
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list