Happy Halloween: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/241

Since [value] only works with floats (and not symbols), I think a set message shouldn't break anything and (helpfully) result in "got symbol but expected float" errors in earlier versions of Pd as opposed to non connections with a missing second inlet.

On Oct 29, 2017, at 9:07 AM, pd-list-request@lists.iem.at wrote:

I was thinking that it could be done through the main inlet using a "set" message, just like the tabread and tabwrite objects. But a second inlet might be good also. What could go wrong?

--------

Dan Wilcox

@danomatika

danomatika.com

robotcowboy.com