29 Oct
2017
29 Oct
'17
11:20 a.m.
Happy Halloween: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/241 https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/241
Since [value] only works with floats (and not symbols), I think a set message shouldn't break anything and (helpfully) result in "got symbol but expected float" errors in earlier versions of Pd as opposed to non connections with a missing second inlet.
On Oct 29, 2017, at 9:07 AM, pd-list-request@lists.iem.at wrote:
I was thinking that it could be done through the main inlet using a "set" message, just like the tabread and tabwrite objects. But a second inlet might be good also. What could go wrong?
Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/