On Nov 7, 2007 12:19 AM, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
>> but
>> different amps and "half rectify" them, in the first excluding the
>> negative values and in the second the positives, in order to create this
>> pseudo-sine wave.
> [max~ 0] and [min~ 0] will help here.
> Also [+~] to combine them after half-rectification.
> Hope this helps.

The curve won't have a continuous derivative, which may sound weird if the
curve is played slow enough. If ever your solution is not sufficient, it
might be better to try to come up with the integral of some continuous
function, but it may be a bit hard to make it align with the desired
frequencies.

Actually, and luckily, it doesn´t sound bad, even when it´s very slow.
Anyway,  thinking about linear vs. logarithmic (and thinking to my less than good knowledge of functions :-), I ended up with a patch (attached) that uses curve~.
Do you think it is a good strategy or  not?
best regards,
libero
 
for wide vibratos, it's also important to ask yourself which scale you
want to work in: linear vs logarithmic sound different for any
sufficiently wide vibrato.

 _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada



--
Libero Mureddu
Vanha Viertotie, 21 as 417
00350 Helsinki
Finland
http://webusers.siba.fi/~limuredd/
http://www.myspace.com/liberomureddu