On Sat, 7 Jun 2008, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I think that gridflow would probably be more easily maintained outside of Pd-extended, for now at least.
GridFlow is not in a situation much different from Gem or PDP. It's just that there's more of an incentive to get Gem running in pd-extended, than there is to get GridFlow running. I'm talking about today's GridFlow, which is quite Rubyless. I think that basically you say that because you simply don't feel like handling it.
Now I have a contract item that is to include GridFlow in pd-extended, or if that fails, at least to make a version of pd-extended that has GridFlow in it. It is likely that it gets done in June, perhaps even in the next few days.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal, Québec