Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
odd to me. Perhaps [routeOSC] could be renamed to soemthing like [set_route].
what about [routes] (as in 'route'-'S'ettable), since it can handle multiple routes and the name suggest a relation to [route] rather than to [set]?
of course one could argue that the names are too similar, but you could always make an alias to "hudriwudri"
mfg.asdr. IOhannes