Sweet! I don't remember when you put that in either, I never noticed before. Seems it needs the "symbol" selector in front of the message for the send name, btw. -Chuckk
On 8/18/07, Miller Puckette mpuckett@imusic1.ucsd.edu wrote:
I can't remember when I put it in, but "send" with no arguments now sprouts a second inlet to set the receiver.
cheers Miller
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 11:37:10PM -0400, marius schebella wrote:
you are right. although I heard some talking about new features with pd 0.40 or 0.41??? frank barknecht also posted a workaround for variable length lists some days ago.
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20070816/a1d74535/a...
marius.
Robert Scott wrote:
On Sunday 19 August 2007 02:52, marius schebella wrote:
you can use a message and stat with semicolon followed by the
location
you want to send to: [;receiver1 123(
or with variables:
[receiver1 123(
[;$1 $2(
that will send 123 to "receiver1". marius.
I'd never thought to use a $ as the object selector there - maybe I
should go
to bed earlier - thankyou marius.
One issue though.
I'd like to be able to send arbitrary length lists down this send, and
the
positional parameters wouldn't seem to be able to do this.
robert.
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list