Yo Yves,
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 7:49 PM, ydegoyon ydegoyon@gmail.com wrote:
hey. luke,
ok, the documentation here is very useful and well-done
Thanks
but, as usual, as almost always, it's not a technical problem really here, it is how naby different versions of pd are we going to produce now?
The idea of a "branch" doesn't have to mean a "fork"... the pd-extended 0.40 branch is just Hans trying to get a stable arrangement of objects for the next Pd-E release while still being able to commit his changes to subversion in order to work on it over a longer period of time.
i'm glad i can make my branch on subversion but i feel like a monkey with my tribe
But you could make a branch, it just wouldn't make much sense to do the entire trunk down if you're only going to work on code within, say, pidip/. So, you can just branch that directory if you ever wanted to work on an experimental feature, while still committing, but leaving a stable version in the trunk.
oh oh i did a quote there!
and then subversion has nothing to do with politics if it is to divide people
oh oh i did a quote
and fuck if i have to commit to ten branches and tribes
You of course don't have to merge into the pd-e-40 branch unless you want your latest stuff included in the release.
I obviously agree that it is a tedious process, but, an entire Pd-E release is not that common so usually I guess committing to the trunk will do. As I said in the docs, SVN 1.5 makes this about 1/5th the effort, which is enough to make it tolerable IMO.
Usually the branch maintainer would do the merging of everyone else's stuff, but I think in this case the Pd-repo is too huge.
So, there is some work as SVN Ambassador. Cheers Luke
no this is not a quote
ok, see ya, sevy
Luke Iannini wrote:
Yo yves, There is branches/pd-extended/v0-40 that produces the release, you'll have to merge over any changes. I wrote a guide here if you need it http://puredata.info/docs/developer/MergingHowto
Cheers Luke
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 8:36 AM, ydegoyon ydegoyon@gmail.com wrote:
ola,
sorry, why PiDiP version is 0.12.22 when i committed a 0.12.23 in the trunk?
isn't it produced from the trunk ? this is somewhat important for us to have the new pdp_v4l2 and pdp_ieee1394 for cameras
thx, sevy
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
For this release, there has been a lot of work in making the GUI and user experience much more fluid and easy.
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list