On Sun, May 08, 2016 at 12:09:04AM +0000, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
> Hi Jerome,If you're saying that your patches used to work and they now break,
> do file a bug about it.  Others on the list have mentioned using
> [declare] for this purpose-- I never have but it's a reasonable use case.
>
> -Jonathan
>
> 
>
>    On Saturday, May 7, 2016 7:30 PM, Jérôme Abel <abel.jerome@free.fr> wrote:
> 
>
>  Hi list,
>
> With the new [declare] behavior, I am a little confused (Pd.0.47). I've
> read that putting [declare] in abstractions was not the "right" way, but
> that what I've done. Shame.
>
> In La Malinette (malinette.info), it is very useful to have an
> abstraction named [include] which contains all relatives paths of all
> abstractions folders. The goal is to be user friendly and not ask people
> to add 6 paths in preferences ...  And if I want to change a path, to
> add a common feature for all patches, I have just to change it once, all
> patches that have this abstraction are affected. And I want to add paths
> to my patchs I have just to remember the name of [include] to add this
> object and paths. These are benefits of having abstractions, like
> object-oriented programming.
>
> How can avoid to copy/paste 100 times a subpatch which contains
> [declare] and all paths, in all my files ? Or may be there is a way to
> add dynamically paths on all patches or current patches ? I can't see
> [import] in Deken, may be it could be the right way to add this kind of
> feature ? Is it downloable ?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jerome
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
> 

> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list