If you are referring to external support, yes most externals need to be recompiled as fat x86_64 / arm, then they are good to go for the foreseeable future.
Message: 3Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 02:06:39 -0300From: Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com>To: Christof Ressi <info@christofressi.com>Cc: pd-list@lists.iem.atSubject: Re: [PD] [PD-announce] Pd 0.52-2 releasedMessage-ID: <CAEAsFmghrVft77FiXSKAko=-puxa=Zd=pVL-BNQbujWvZh=kdQ@mail.gmail.com>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"Em ter., 29 de mar. de 2022 ?s 11:12, Christof Ressi <info@christofressi.com>escreveu:From my understanding, yes. For that reason, I guess it's not a good idea
to provide universal binaries at this point and we should rather ship
seperate binaries. Once most externals are available as universal binaries,
we might ship Pd as a universal binary as well.
Of course, you can always force apps to run under Rosetta, but I don'tthink that's a good user experience.
I agree, separate binaries makes more sense these days.