What do you expect the patch to do, hang Pd?
For me it prints this in the Pd 0.46.7 console:
  packOSC: This packet is not a bundle, so you can't write another address
  packOSC: Problem writing address.
  packOSC: According to the type tag I didn't expect any more arguments.
  packOSC: usage error, write-msg failed.
  print: /trigger/osc/message now
It's possible to open a bundle (with a '[' message) and add multiple messages, but the OSC message is output only when the bundle is closed with the ']' message.
In your patch, if you put a [delay] after the bang outlet it will start an infinite loop at the delay interval. I'm not sure why the delay is necessary though, as [packOSC] should have finished processing the previous message by the time the next one arrives, even if it's a zero logical time delay.

Martin


On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Roman Haefeli <reduzent@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all

I noticed that [packOSC] does not support reentrancy (check attached
patch).

Many object classes _do_ support reentrancy. At the same time it seems
common in other environments not to support reentrancy. I wonder if this
is considered bug. If so, I'll file a bug report.

Roman

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list