> >On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 06:27:54PM -0500, Dan Wilcox wrote:
> >>I've been using s-arranger as a song sequencer for a while and  
> >>it's been
> >>great.  As of newer pd-extended 0.40.3 builds, s-arranger objects  
> >>have
> >>been asking to save their contents ("Discard changes ...?") on patch
> >>close, as if I had opened them and saved to base s-arranger, not that
> >>instance.

> On Aug 9, 2008, at 4:17 AM, Chris McCormick wrote:
> >When I follow your instructions I don't get the discard changes  
> >dialog.
> >Seems to work fine for me. I wonder if there is an older, crappier
> >version of it in pd-extended?  I'll try to get the version in
> >pd-extended updated some time soon.

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 04:56:59PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> I am cc'ing the list, since this is probably of general interest.
> 
> This might be related to the dirty flag being set when an IEMGUI's  
> properties are changed.  It was changed it so that when the  
> properties of an IEMGUI was changed, the dirty flag was set.  I  
> suppose there should be differentiation between it happening with  
> messages and it happening when the user makes the change in the  
> Properties panel.

That can't be it because [s-arranger] doesn't have any IEMGUIs that hold
state. There are two possibilities:

1. Some older bugger version of s-arranger is in pd-extended because I
haven't checked my changes into the official repository for ages.
Because of the way that s-arranger is patched, I find this less likely
than:

2. There is a bug in pd-extended.

Chris.