2 Oct
2018
2 Oct
'18
11:41 p.m.
On 10/2/18 11:22 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
i'm not sure whether i said that before: you shouldn't open/close patches during performance, and instead let your data flow to (only) the places where it is required.
that's probably to generic. i really meant, that you shouldn't abuse patch open/close to enable/disable certain "data processors". Pd has dataflow objects for these kind of operation ([route], [select], [spigot], [moses], [change],..)
i only mention this because i think you use this automatic patch opening/closing as a software-pattern. although it's nice that Pd can do those kind of things ("look ma, window chaos"), i think you might be using an anti-pattern.
gfamdsr IOhannes