no, but it's obviously more inefficient :)

it could be simpler if you were to use [change~], that was the tricky part for me

2015-06-07 12:20 GMT-03:00 Peter P. <peterparker@fastmail.com>:

* Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com> [2015-06-06 17:17]:
> the other day I implemented, just for fun, the [cyclone/slide~] object with
> [fexpr~], it's 100% compatible to vanilla. find it attached. cheers
Great! Did you have a chance to compare cpu useage between the two?