Hey Seb,
Good to hear from you...
Does [osc~] take arguments? In my test when I gave the patch an [osc~ 0] I got an error in the console saying '0' not understood and I presumed that was my argument being spat back.
I can't really explain why it doesn't sound right to be honest, this is why I'm here asking:).
I need to do some more coding and get back to you on that one.
Regards,
Julian
On 24 August 2015 at 15:10, s p sebpiq@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Julian,
I've never used [cos~], can you explain to me why an [osc~] with the correct phase cannot do the trick?
Cheers
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Julian Brooks jbeezez@gmail.com wrote:
Some good stuff here, thanks people.
[osc~] doesn't appear to take arguments so that's out. I don't doubt Alexandre's ears or thoroughness but in this instance,when replacing [cos~] with [osc~] there's a big difference in the sound. Alexandros - thanks for the sketch, yes it does make sense, webpd has no [until] or [cos]. Joe- nice implementation, again unfortunately there's no [abs~] or [wrap~].
What I do think from the hints and suggestions given is that I've got enough to be getting on with to make something approximately close and hopefully interesting.
Thanks all for suggestions so far,
Julian
On 24 August 2015 at 10:30, Joe White white.joe4@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Julian,
I've attached an optimised implementation for [cos~] that we've been using for Heavy. It's an approximate taylor series expansion but it should be much faster than just using cosf(). Hopefully webpd supports [abs~] and [wrap~].
Cheers, Joe
On 24 August 2015 at 09:18, Alexandros Drymonitis adrcki@gmail.com wrote:
what about this?
[table_size( | [until] | [f]x[+ 1] | [t f f]__________ | | [/ table_size] | | | [* twoPi] | | | [cos] | | | [tabwrite table name]
well, ASCII patches don't look so good, but I hope you get the picture.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Alexandre Torres Porres < porres@gmail.com> wrote:
cause I made some tests, [osc~] will give the same result as [cos~]...
2015-08-24 3:26 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres porres@gmail.com:
> Unfortunately [osc~] doesn't have the tonal quality I'm after
how is that?
2015-08-23 17:35 GMT-03:00 Julian Brooks jbeezez@gmail.com:
> Alexandre & Alexandros, > > Cheers for pitching in. > > It's for a random bleepy patch. > Unfortunately [osc~] doesn't have the tonal quality I'm after - good > idea though. > > On 23 August 2015 at 20:53, Alexandre Torres Porres < > porres@gmail.com> wrote: > >> i do realize that, but who knows what he needs this for, it may >> work... :) >> >> 2015-08-23 16:37 GMT-03:00 Alexandros Drymonitis adrcki@gmail.com >> : >> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres < >>> porres@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> you can treat [osc~] as [cos~] >>>> >>>> just give it a frequency of "0" and use the phase inlet as the >>>> angle input (from 0 to 1). >>>> >>> But the phase inlet of [osc~] is a control inlet, and [cos~] takes >>> signals.. >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> >> >
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
*Sébastien Piquemal*
-----* @sebpiq* ----- http://github.com/sebpiq ----- http://funktion.fm