Testing Video on Ubuntu 14.10 64Bit

https://www.facebook.com/jonghyuncomposer/videos/1074724619218680/


On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Jonghyun Kim <agitato816@gmail.com> wrote:
It works. Great! I have a question. where is JACK option? It runs only with ALSA.

Jonghyun
akntk

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Jonghyun Kim <agitato816@gmail.com> wrote:
now it seems works. thanks!

jonghyun

=====
$ sudo dpkg -i pd-l2ork-x86_64-20150920.debĀ 
(Reading database ... 474214 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack pd-l2ork-x86_64-20150920.deb ...
Unpacking pd-l2ork (20150920) over (20150920) ...
Setting up pd-l2ork (20150920) ...
Processing triggers for mime-support (3.55ubuntu1.1) ...
Processing triggers for gnome-menus (3.10.1-0ubuntu2) ...
Processing triggers for desktop-file-utils (0.22-1ubuntu2) ...
Processing triggers for bamfdaemon (0.5.1+14.10.20140925-0ubuntu1) ...
Rebuilding /usr/share/applications/bamf-2.index...
Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.0.2-2) ...
Processing triggers for hicolor-icon-theme (0.13-1) ...
Processing triggers for shared-mime-info (1.2-0ubuntu3) ...
Unknown media type in type 'all/all'
Unknown media type in type 'all/allfiles'
Unknown media type in type 'uri/mms'
Unknown media type in type 'uri/mmst'
Unknown media type in type 'uri/mmsu'
Unknown media type in type 'uri/pnm'
Unknown media type in type 'uri/rtspt'
Unknown media type in type 'uri/rtspu'
Processing triggers for ureadahead (0.100.0-16) ...
$
=======

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 4:18 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig@iem.at> wrote:
On 2015-09-21 03:42, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
> I think that was because it was built with libMagick++4 whereas 14.04
> and newer Ubuntu versions have libMagick++5. I am not sure why this
> matters (sounds to me like something may be improperly symlinked
> system-wise).

i would say that Debian has a pretty well established system to avoid
breakage of applications due to library incompatibilities.

part of this scheme is to rename library packages (e.g. "libMagick++4"
vs "libMagick++5") if and only if the two libraries are binary incompatible.
usually this means that some previously exported symbols have vanished
in the newer version.

a specific application might not use those symbols at all and would thus
not be affected by the incompatibility.
but using symlinks (system-wide!) is certainly the right approach to
break your system, and thus should be avoided.

there are two solutions for this problem:
- ship all dependencies (the w32 and OSX way)
- link against the proper libraries (the linux distro way)

fgmadrt
IOhannes

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list