14 May
2010
14 May
'10
5:06 p.m.
On Fri, 14 May 2010, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
you would only need [pix_crop]->[pix_movement] without the [pix_separator] (since the crop will have to allocate a new image anyhow), thus no need for the extra copying of data.
But I'm taking into account the possibility of chaining several [pix_motion_sector], which would generally need access to the same original picture.
I don't know how image allocation works in GEM. Which objects allocate a new picture, and what does that mean in terms of getting access back to the original picture, with or without [pix_separator] ?
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801