Hi Eric,
what exactly is the difference of samm~ compared to the long time existing iem t3 objects?
t3 uses time tagged triggers, samm~ sends clicks that are not time tagged.
I see, are there other advantages (cpu-wise maybe)? Since these
periodic clicks could also be generated with t3-based abstractions.
particularly with the soundfile player called player~ which I think has some
nice
features.
I'll definitely look into that one, although xsample also allows signal controlled sample processing.
Both groove~ and xsample~ have a lot more features than player~. The two features I likely about player~ are internal polyphony and sample-accurate triggering. (Perhaps xsample~ can do that too?)
xsample can do sample-accurate triggering, but has no internal
polyphony.
greetings, Thomas
-- Thomas Grill http://grrrr.org