>turning that into an external is maybe not efficient - it would better to add these features to the >already existing array object.
I meant, altering the existing array into a new bounded_array object, or whatever name suits better. The difference is it would be a compiled object and not an abstraction.

best regards,
Pedro

On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Joćo Pais <jmmmpais@googlemail.com> wrote:
I've written a version of an array with step values and limits, using data
structures. I could send it to >the list, but I would need some time to
isolate the code from the main patch.
That would be interesting Joćo! Another possibility is turning that into a
direct external, that does the work internally. (I'm assuming you did an
abstraction... "because you said isolate it from the main patch" - if not,
even better!)

turning that into an external is maybe not efficient - it would better to add these features to the already existing array object.

yes, it would be an abstraction. it isn't in my patch, but can easily turn into one. I'm very busy now, if I find the time I'll make an abstraction out of it.



--
Pedro Lopes
contacto: jazz@radiozero.pt
website: http://web.ist.utl.pt/Pedro.Lopes